"Given our shared objectives, we have agreed to enter into a formal partnership, the ultimate goal of which is to build levels of trust to enable sharing of research data."
- ORCID blog post by Laure Haak, 18 May 2017
See: https://orcid.org/blog/2017/05/18/orcid-wds-partner
Links, stories, images and articles about data-intensive research from Australia and beyond. An unofficial blog created by the Australian Research data Commons (Formerly: Australian National Data Service (ANDS), Nectar & RDS)) for the purpose of recording and sharing external content. ARDC does not endorse the content posted.
Showing posts with label partnerships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label partnerships. Show all posts
Saturday, 20 May 2017
ORCID and WDS Partner to support reuse of research data
Friday, 14 August 2015
Griffith Research Hub: Connecting an entire University's research enterprise
Natasha Simons, Arve Solland, Jan Hettenhausen
Book chapter in: Linked Data and User Interaction
IFLA publication, deGruyter 2015
Abstract: Universities are operating in a
knowledge environment characterised by competition, collaboration, a
diversification of research outputs and rapid technological change. Thus the
use of linked data is rapidly gaining momentum, typically for educational
resources with research as a subset of this content. The Griffith Research Hub is focused
specifically on exposing linked data for research. It provides a publicly
accessible, single comprehensive view of Griffith University’s research output
and activities, including research publications, projects, datasets, centres,
researchers and their collaborators. The Hub serves an ambitiously wide
audience including higher degree research students, researchers, industry and
the media. Built in-house on open source semantic web technologies, the Hub
draws data automatically from multiple enterprise systems and includes an edit
interface for manual correction and enrichment of data. The Hub is the product
of a partnership between Griffith University and the Australian National Data
Service. Benefits of the Hub
include powerful yet simple search and browse tools, generation of substantial
web traffic, linked data that allows users to seamlessly discover related
information in other services and databases including at the National Library
of Australia, visualisation features, and the development of a shared ontology
to describe research activities.
Labels:
academic libraries,
data visualisation,
partnerships,
research data management,
semantic web
Librarians as partners in research data service development at Griffith University
Samantha Searle,
Malcolm Wolski, Natasha Simons, Joanna Richardson
Program 2015 49:4
The
purpose of the paper is to describe the evolution to date and future
directions in research data policy, infrastructure, skills development
and advisory services in an Australian university, with a focus on the
role of librarians.
The
authors have been involved in the development of research data services
at Griffith, and the case study presents observations and reflections
arising from their first-hand experiences.
Griffith
University's organisational structure and 'whole-of-enterprise'
approach has facilitated service development to support research data.
Fostering strong national partnerships has also accelerated development
of institutional capability. Policies and strategies are supported by
pragmatic best practice guidelines aimed directly at researchers.
Iterative software development and a commitment to well-supported
enterprise infrastructure enable the provision of a range of data
management solutions. Training programs, repository support and data
planning services are still relatively immature. Griffith recognises
that information services staff (including librarians) will need more
opportunities to develop knowledge and skills to support these services
as they evolve.
This
case study provides examples of library-led and library-supported
activities that could be used for comparative purposes by other
libraries. At the same time, it provides a critical perspective by
contrasting areas of good practice within the University with those of
less satisfactory progress. While other institutions may have different
constraints or opportunities, some of the major concepts within this
paper may prove useful to advance the development of research data
capability and capacity across the library profession.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)