Abstract: Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and
scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research
data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is
attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the
reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new
research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers
and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a
conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the
primary researcher’s point of view. We show that this process can be
divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients.
Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications
regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research
policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that
research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research
policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the
quality of research results and foster scientific progress.
Full article in PLOS One: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053
No comments:
Post a Comment